This article examines the synergies between impact litigation and movement lawyering, and explores how impact litigation can help mobilize directly impacted individuals, while catalyzing support from a broad spectrum of stakeholders.
This webinar explores the Trump administration’s migration policies, including asylum restrictions, TPS terminations, border militarization, and migrant transfers to third countries. Panelists discuss legal, humanitarian, and due process implications.
This document analyses President Trump's January 2025 executive actions, focusing on their impact on asylum seekers, immigrant communities in the United States, and broader implications for Latin America and the Caribbean.
Este memorando analiza acciones ejecutivas tomadas por el presidente Trump en enero de 2025, enfocándose en su impacto en quienes buscan protección en Estados Unidos, la comunidad inmigrante y sus implicaciones más amplias para América Latina y el Caribe.
CGRS submitted input to the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, addressing the phenomenon of missing migrants. This submission highlights how U.S. border policies place asylum seekers at risk, including exposure to kidnapping and disappearances.
Esta hoja informativa analiza el esperado endurecimiento de políticas de asilo y fronterizas bajo el segundo mandato de Trump, incluyendo restricciones al acceso al asilo, externalización fronteriza, aumento de deportaciones y reducción de vías migratorias regulares.
We submitted our analysis of the government's final rule that essentially closes off asylum during "emergency border circumstances." Our comment urges the government to withdraw the rule in its entirety.
In this policy memo, the #WelcomeWithDignity Campaign recommends four practical solutions to ensure meaningful access to asylum and increase safety at the border.
We submitted our analysis of the government's interim final rule that essentially closes off asylum during "emergency border circumstances." Our comment urges the government to withdraw the rule in its entirety.
We submitted our analysis of the government's proposed rule permitting asylum officers to consider the applicability of statutory bars during initial fear screenings. Our comment urges the government to withdraw the rule in its entirety.