Anabel's case was at the center of the Trump administration's assault on protections for domestic violence survivors seeking safety.
In 2018, our client Anabel's case became the focus of the Trump administration's campaign to eviscerate protections for survivors of domestic violence seeking asylum.
Following years of hard-fought litigation and advocacy, in 2021 Attorney General Merrick Garland vacated the decision in her case (Matter of A-B-), along with other Trump-era Justice Department rulings that attempted to shut the door on people escaping domestic violence, gang brutality, and other human rights violations.
[[{"fid":"10021","view_mode":"default","fields":{"format":"default"},"type":"media","field_deltas":{"1":{"format":"default"}},"attributes":{"class":"media-element file-default","data-delta":"1"}}]]
Anabel's pursuit of justice spanned many years and multiple presidential administrations. She shared her story with reporters, elected officials, and community members who came together to demand protection for Anabel and refugee survivors like her.
In the spring of 2023, Anabel was finally able to bring her kids and grandkids to safety in the U.S. after years of separation. Listen to their story on NPR.
We successfully advocated for Attorney General Garland to vacate the Trump-era ruling in Anabel's case, which slammed the door on refugee survivors of domestic violence.
Anabel's victory took years of hard-fought advocacy by communities who lifted their voices in support of refugee survivors, under the banner of #ImmigrantWomenToo.
Six months after Jeff Sessions denied her asylum, Anabel shared her story of abuse in El Salvador, the impossibility of finding protection in her home country, and her quest to find safety.
[[{"fid":"17874","view_mode":"default","fields":{"format":"default"},"type":"media","field_deltas":{"2":{"format":"default"}},"attributes":{"class":"media-element file-default","data-delta":"2"}}]]
At Home, Anabel Has Nowhere to Turn
Anabel was born in El Salvador in the 1970s. She lost her parents at a young age and was subsequently separated from her siblings and placed in the care of a family friend who physically and verbally abused her. When she was in her early 20s, Anabel met the man who would become her husband. After they married, his abuse began.
Over the 15 years that followed, Anabel’s husband subjected her to horrific physical, sexual, and emotional violence. He beat and raped Anabel so many times that she lost count. He also frequently threatened to kill her, often brandishing a loaded gun or a knife. Anabel’s husband was violent even during her pregnancies, on one occasion threatening to hang her with a rope from the roof of their house.
When they first met, Anabel was pursuing her education, but her husband forced her to cut her studies short. He constantly belittled and demeaned her verbally. Anabel’s husband also often falsely accused her of infidelity, going so far as ordering her to undress and show him her genitals so he could see if she had been with another man.
Anabel’s relationship with her husband was characterized by constant brutality and she often feared for her life. She repeatedly sought protection from the Salvadoran authorities, to no avail. While she was able to obtain two restraining orders against her husband, they went completely unenforced, and he continued to abuse and threaten her. After one particularly terrifying incident in which her husband attacked her with a large knife, Anabel went to the police and they refused to help, saying instead “if you have any dignity, you will get out of here.”
Heeding their advice, she left her husband, moving to a town that was two hours away from where they lived together. But he managed to find her there and the abuse continued. Anabel then sought a divorce, which resulted in escalating threats on her life. A month after the divorce was finalized, her ex-husband, accompanied by his police officer brother, accosted her and told her that the divorce meant nothing and that her life was in danger. Following this incident, Anabel’s ex-husband and men with whom he associated continued to threaten her, describing in graphic detail how they intended to kill her.
One week before she left the country, her ex-husband tracked her down again and physically assaulted her. With nowhere to turn, Anabel fled El Salvador to seek protection in the United States.
Anabel Seeks Refuge in the United States
Upon her arrival in the United States, Anabel was screened in and permitted to apply for asylum after an Asylum Officer found that she had a credible fear of persecution in El Salvador based on the violence she had suffered at the hands of her ex-husband. Anabel’s case was sent to the Charlotte Immigration Court, one of the courts most notoriously hostile to asylum seekers, to be heard by V. Stuart Couch, an immigration judge with a long history of denying asylum to domestic violence survivors – and having his decisions overturned on appeal. Unsurprisingly, Judge Couch denied Anabel’s asylum application.
Anabel appealed Judge Couch’s decision, and her case was then heard by the Board of Immigration Appeals, the appellate court with nationwide jurisdiction over immigration cases. The Board reversed Judge Couch’s denial, finding Anabel eligible for protection based on her experiences of domestic violence and sending her case back to the court in Charlotte for Anabel to be granted asylum.
In a departure from usual practice, Judge Couch refused to issue a new decision in the case. He instead attempted to send the case back to Board. Seven months later, Attorney General Jeff Sessions took advantage of a rarely used power to refer the case to himself for a decision.
Trump Administration Denies Anabel Asylum
On June 11, 2018, Sessions issued a deeply disappointing decision in Anabel’s case – known as Matter of A-B- – reversing the Board’s decision. In ruling against Anabel, Sessions overturned an important precedent decision known as Matter of A-R-C-G-, which in 2014 affirmed the right of domestic violence survivors to seek asylum protection. In his decision Sessions made the troubling statement that asylum claims “pertaining to domestic violence” should “generally” no longer be approved.
The Attorney General’s decision completely disregarded the extensive evidence – over 700 pages’ worth – that Anabel submitted to corroborate her asylum claim. Instead, Sessions insisted on calling into question Anabel’s honesty. Consistent with his previous attacks on asylum seekers, Sessions mischaracterized her as an economic migrant gaming the asylum system. His treatment of Anabel suggests that he never had any intention to consider her application for asylum fairly.
Anabel was hurt and confused by the Attorney General’s ruling in her case and by his refusal to believe her story. After learning about his decision she said, “I think immigration judges have something against immigrants. They generalize about immigrants and think that they are coming to work. They don’t understand that we are fleeing for our lives.”
Anabel Prevails and Reunites with Family
Following years of hard-fought litigation and advocacy, on June 16, 2021, Attorney General Garland vacated Matter of A-B- and other Trump-era Justice Department rulings that attempted to shut the door on people escaping domestic violence, gang brutality, and other human rights violations.
Anabel felt profound relief. “I feel content and happy that my case can help other women who are going through the same thing I am," she told reporters.
In 2023 Anabel was finally permitted to bring her children and grandchildren to safety in the United States. NPR captured their joyful reunion in Atlanta. “My heart jumped for joy,” Anabel said. "I always said I wasn't complete when they were in El Salvador. I was 50 percent happy, and 50 percent sad. Now I feel 100 percent happy."