Litigation

Defending asylum seekers in court is at the heart of what we do. The Center for Gender & Refugee Studies is committed to protecting as many refugees as possible under existing law even as we work for a more just legal system. We litigate in two key areas: advancing substantive asylum law to keep legal avenues open for refugees and protecting the asylum system itself to make sure that people have access to a fair legal process. This litigation docket provides an update on some of the major cases that CGRS is fighting in court.

Featured Cases

  • RAICES v. Mullin

    CGRS and our partners are challenging Trump's illegal Proclamation shutting down access to asylum at the southern border.

    SCOTUS
    212(f) Shutdown
    Asylum at the Border
  • Credit: Brooke Anderson
    The Door v. Edlow

    This case challenges the Trump administration’s attempts to fast-track the deportation of unaccompanied children seeking asylum and prevent their attorneys from providing effective representation.

    Asylum Procedures
    Children and Families

All Cases

Filter Search
  • Credit: Brooke Anderson
    E.Q. v. DHS

    CGRS and our partners are challenging the government's Mandatory Bars Rule, which imposes unlawful barriers to protection for people fleeing persecution and torture.

    Asylum at the Border
    Bars to Asylum
  • Credit: Brooke Anderson
    Pangea Legal Services v. DHS

    CGRS and the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program won an injunction blocking a Trump-era rule that would have created nearly insurmountable barriers to asylum.

    Bars to Asylum
    Children and Families
    Gender-Based Asylum