Litigation

Defending asylum seekers in court is at the heart of what we do. The Center for Gender & Refugee Studies is committed to protecting as many refugees as possible under existing law even as we work for a more just legal system. We litigate in two key areas: advancing substantive asylum law to keep legal avenues open for refugees and protecting the asylum system itself to make sure that people have access to a fair legal process. This litigation docket provides an update on some of the major cases that CGRS is fighting in court.

Featured Cases

  • RAICES v. Mullin

    CGRS and our partners are challenging Trump's illegal Proclamation shutting down access to asylum at the southern border.

    SCOTUS
    212(f) Shutdown
    Asylum at the Border
  • Credit: Brooke Anderson
    The Door v. Edlow

    This case challenges the Trump administration’s attempts to fast-track the deportation of unaccompanied children seeking asylum and prevent their attorneys from providing effective representation.

    Asylum Procedures
    Children and Families

All Cases

Filter Search
  • Credit: Brooke Anderson
    Grace v. Barr

    CGRS and the ACLU won an injunction blocking the government from rejecting survivors of gender- and gang-related violence in initial asylum screenings at the border.

    Gender-Based Asylum
  • Credit: Melissa Golden for NPR
    Matter of A-B-

    We successfully advocated for Attorney General Garland to vacate the Trump-era ruling in Matter of A-B-, which slammed the door on refugee survivors of domestic violence.

    Gender-Based Asylum
  • Credit: Brooke Anderson
    Pangea Legal Services v. DHS

    CGRS and the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program won an injunction blocking a Trump-era rule that would have created nearly insurmountable barriers to asylum.

    Bars to Asylum
    Children and Families
    Gender-Based Asylum